Here’s what’s on our plate today:

• 🎙️ The Laboratory: Inside Apple’s $95M Siri eavesdropping payout (privacy, trust, and why your iPhone might be a gossip)

• 🧠 Monday Poll: Would you trust your voice assistant with a real secret?

• ⚡ Bite-Sized Brains: Deepfakes, dangerous apps, and Australia’s big bet on digital privacy for kids

• 💡 Roko Pro Tip: The mic is always hot—protect your data before your secrets become someone else’s business

Let’s dive in. No floaties needed…

The Laboratory

The story behind Apple’s $95 million eavesdropping settlement

Ever had the feeling that your iPhone knows a little too much about you, maybe you were seeing advertisements of things you just had a conversation about? Or that Siri, the voice assistant, could be eavesdropping on you? If you have had this feeling, it turns out you might be on to something.

Recently, Apple settled a class action lawsuit that accused Siri of eavesdropping on users’ private conversations. The iPhone-maker agreed to pay a whopping $95 million as a settlement. Apple chose to settle the case after it issued an apology and suspended its Siri contractor programme, a move that failed to quell legal challenges.

The settlement covers US residents who owned or purchased Siri-enabled devices such as iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches, MacBooks, iMacs, HomePods, or Apple TVs, during the specified period and experienced unintended activations.

What’s the ‘Hey Siri’ controversy?

Siri was first introduced in 2011 with the launch of the iPhone 4S. At the time, Apple’s innovation in speech recognition placed it far ahead of the curve, laying the groundwork for voice assistants like Google Assistant and Samsung’s Bixby.

In 2014, Apple introduced “Hey Siri,” allowing users to activate the assistant by voice alone, without touching their device. A year later, Apple added voice personalization to improve device security, enabling Siri to recognize the primary user’s voice.

But as Siri became more deeply embedded into the Apple ecosystem, privacy concerns began to mount. For Apple, trouble began when, in August 2019, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in California by a resident named Lopez and other Apple users. The complaint alleged that Siri was not only listening when it shouldn’t, but that Apple was storing private conversations and allowing third parties to access this data for targeted advertising.

What were the accusations against Apple?

The lawsuit claimed that Siri-enabled Apple devices recorded users without consent and that this data was shared with third-party companies, including restaurants and retail brands. These businesses allegedly used the information to serve targeted ads in Apple’s Safari browser and search platforms.

One plaintiff reported receiving advertisements for a brand-name surgical treatment shortly after discussing it privately with their doctor. Others described seeing ads for products like Air Jordan speakers, Pit Viper sunglasses, and Olive Garden promotions following similar private conversations.

While Apple denied any wrongdoing, the lawsuit gained traction. In 2021, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White refused to dismiss the case, calling the allegations “plausible” and allowing it to move forward.

What was Apple’s defense?

In response, Apple firmly denied the accusation that Siri was designed to eavesdrop or collect user conversations for advertising purposes. The company explained that some Siri features require real-time server processing, but maintained that only minimal data is collected to fulfill those requests.

Apple emphasized that it does not retain recordings of Siri interactions unless users have explicitly opted in to improve the assistant’s accuracy. Following the settlement announcement, Apple reiterated that Siri recordings were used solely to improve the assistant’s performance and were never sold to third parties. It also stated its ongoing commitment to developing privacy-focused technologies that give users more control over their data.

Understanding the settlement payout

As part of the class action settlement, Apple will pay $95 million to cover legal fees, administrative costs, and compensation for eligible users. These users include individuals who used Siri-enabled Apple products between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024, and who experienced Siri activating unintentionally during a private or confidential conversation.

Eligible claimants can receive up to $20 per device, with a maximum of five devices per person, meaning the most any individual can receive is $100. Some consumers received email or postcard notifications containing a claim ID and confirmation code. These messages, titled “Lopez Voice Assistant Class Action Settlement,” provide instructions on how to file claims through the official settlement website.

For those who did not receive a notification but believe they qualify, there is still an opportunity to file a claim by submitting proof of purchase and personal information on the same website. The deadline to file is July 2, 2025. Payments will be issued after the final approval hearing scheduled for August 1, 2025, provided no appeals delay the process. Claimants can choose to receive compensation via direct deposit, e-check, or physical check.

The bigger picture: privacy, profits, and public trust

Although $95 million sounds substantial, it is only a small dent in Apple’s financials. In 2024 alone, Apple reported profits of $93.7 billion, making this settlement roughly equivalent to nine hours of earnings. In the broader landscape of privacy litigation, Apple’s payout is consistent with other major tech cases. For instance, Meta paid $90 million in a 2022 case involving unauthorized cookie tracking, while TikTok agreed to a $92 million settlement for improper data collection practices. In those cases, the average per-user payout ranged from $27 to $39.

Privacy advocates argue that such settlements, while symbolically important, rarely provide meaningful compensation to individual users. With only a small percentage of class members typically filing claims, often between three and five percent, the actual financial impact is minimal for the companies involved.

These cases highlight the difficulty in quantifying privacy violations and the limited legal tools currently available to hold companies accountable for abstract harms. They also raise deeper concerns about how much user data is really worth, especially in an industry built on monetizing attention and behavior.

A warning shot for Apple and Big Tech

The Siri case is a clear reminder that even companies known for their privacy stance are not immune to legal challenges. Apple has long marketed itself as a protector of user privacy, and yet it now finds itself in the same courtroom conversations as its competitors.

This lawsuit represents more than a $95 million payout. It marks a broader reckoning with how voice assistants and digital services operate in the background of users’ lives. As artificial intelligence becomes more deeply integrated into everyday technologies, the risks to personal data and the expectations for corporate accountability will only grow.

For Apple and its peers, the message is clear. Convenience can no longer come at the expense of transparency. If companies continue to collect data passively or design features that obscure consent, they may increasingly find themselves answering not only to regulators but to their users.

Monday Poll

Bite-Sized Brains

• The Australian government is introducing a Children's Online Privacy Code, aiming to grant individuals the right to delete their digital footprints upon turning 18.

• Cybersecurity experts have identified a trojanized version of the popular password manager KeePass, dubbed "KeeLoader," being distributed through malicious search advertisements.

• The latest advancements in AI video generation have produced content with unprecedented realism, raising concerns about the potential for deepfakes and misinformation.

Roko Pro Tip

Meme of the Day

Rate this edition